Hover to interact
Front
Photos
Jacob Misiorowski
Card Owner
Card Collector • Premium
Connect with collectors • Discuss cards • Build community
Card Information
Grade Breakdown
ResultsFront Side
Back Side
Analysis
Square-cut sports-card construction. Using the orientation of each supplied photograph: front top-left A, top-right A, bottom-left A, bottom-right A; back top-left A, top-right A, bottom-left A, bottom-right A. All eight retain pointed, approximately 90-degree profiles without identifiable fraying, rounding, or dings.
How this affects your grade:
Corners accounts for a significant portion of the overall grade. This strong score contributes well to the final grade.
Front Side
Back Side
Analysis
Front top, bottom, left, and right edges appear straight and intact, with no identifiable chipping or nicks. Back top, bottom, left, and right edges likewise appear clean. Slight photographic softness along the perimeter is not counted as wear.
How this affects your grade:
Edges accounts for a significant portion of the overall grade. This exceptional score positively impacts the final grade.
Front Side
Back Side
Analysis
No visible scratches, scuffs, creases, dents, stains, or print lines on either face. Front image and lettering are intact; the back has clean text and an even background. Both surfaces appear mint, without enough affirmative evidence of flawless gloss to assign 10.
How this affects your grade:
Surface accounts for a significant portion of the overall grade. This exceptional score positively impacts the final grade.
Front Side
Back Side
Analysis
Front white side borders are approximately 45–55 pixels wide through the middle, suggesting roughly 50/50 to 52/48 left/right. Top and bottom spacing appears approximately 45/55 after allowing for perspective and the asymmetric nameplate. Back layout appears reasonably balanced, approximately 50/50 to 55/45; its asymmetric design prevents reliable equal-border measurement.
How this affects your grade:
Centering accounts for a significant portion of the overall grade. This exceptional score positively impacts the final grade.
Front Side
Back Side
Analysis
Not applicable; no holographic or refractor finish is visible.
How this affects your grade:
Holographic accounts for a significant portion of the overall grade. Improving this area could increase the overall grade.
Precision Scan
Perspective-corrected inspection · 8 defects found
8.3
Corners
9.5
Edges
10
Surface
The top-left corner shows the clearest rounding; the remaining corners show minor edge roughness or tip softening. No definite creases, peeling, or scratches are visible in these crops. The visible edge runs appear intact, with slight softening at the shared upper-left corner. Inverted-only views limit confirmation of whitening, and part of the right edge is clipped by the crop. No identifiable scratches, creases, indentations, or other surface damage are visible in either variant. Enhanced outlines and border texture appear consistent with the printed design rather than wear. The left corners retain sharp square points; the right tips show slight softening. No distinct whitening, exposed frayed paper, or structural damage is confirmed across the variants. No definite whitening, fraying, or edge damage is visible in the supplied inverted strips. Assessment is limited to the edge portions shown; base-colour variants were not provided for confirmation. The back surface appears clean, with no confirmed scratches, creases, stains, or abrasions in either the base or mono image.
Front corners
Top-left corner
6/10
- moderatecorner wear — Outer corner tip. The tip has a visible rounded contour rather than a sharp square intersection.
Top-right corner
8/10
- minoredge wear — Top cut edge adjacent to the corner. The top edge shows fine uneven roughness while the corner remains substantially square.
Bottom-left corner
8/10
- minoredge wear — Bottom cut edge extending from the corner. The bottom edge has a finely ragged outline visible in the base and enhanced views.
Bottom-right corner
8/10
- minorcorner wear — Outer corner tip. The point is slightly softened rather than crisply square.
Front edges
Top edge
8/10
- minorcorner wear — Left endpoint. The upper-left point is slightly softened rather than forming a crisp square intersection.
Bottom edge
10/10
No defects found in this region
Left edge
8/10
- minorcorner wear — Upper endpoint. The upper-left point shows slight softening where the left and top edges meet.
Right edge
10/10
No defects found in this region
Front surface
Surface
10/10
No defects found in this region
Back corners
Back top-left corner
10/10
No defects found in this region
Back top-right corner
8/10
- minorcorner wear — Extreme corner tip. The tip is slightly softened rather than forming a crisp square point.
Back bottom-left corner
10/10
No defects found in this region
Back bottom-right corner
8/10
- minorcorner wear — Extreme corner tip. The outermost point shows slight softening where the bottom and right edges meet.
Back edges
Back top edge
10/10
No defects found in this region
Back bottom edge
10/10
No defects found in this region
Back left edge
10/10
No defects found in this region
Back right edge
10/10
No defects found in this region
Back surface
Back surface
10/10
No defects found in this region
Grading History & Distribution
Average Grade
9.0
Highest Grade
9.0
Total Submissions
2
Grade Distribution
Recent Submissions
Nov 6, 2026
9.0
Overall
Nov 6, 2026
9.0
Overall
Grading Consistency
Range: 9.0 - 9.0✅ Highly consistent grading across submissions