Hover to interact
Front
Photos
Jac Caglianone
Card Owner
Card Collector • Premium
Connect with collectors • Discuss cards • Build community
Card Information
Grade Breakdown
ResultsFront Side
Back Side
Analysis
Sports-card square-corner construction. Front: top-left A, top-right A, bottom-left A, bottom-right A; all show intact points without visible fraying or rounding. Back, using the uploaded orientation: top-left A, top-right A, bottom-left A, bottom-right A. Bright material outside the back top-left corner appears to be the sleeve, not damaged cardstock.
How this affects your grade:
Corners accounts for a significant portion of the overall grade. Improving this area could increase the overall grade.
Front Side
Back Side
Analysis
Front top, bottom, left and right edges appear straight and intact, without visible chipping. Back edges likewise show no definite nicks, layering or exposed paper. Sleeve boundaries are excluded.
How this affects your grade:
Edges accounts for a significant portion of the overall grade. This exceptional score positively impacts the final grade.
Front Side
Back Side
Analysis
Front has no visible scratches, dents, creases or print lines. Back printing and background appear clean, with no visible stains, scuffs or creases. Reflections and photographic softness are not counted as damage.
How this affects your grade:
Surface accounts for a significant portion of the overall grade. This exceptional score positively impacts the final grade.
Front Side
Back Side
Analysis
Front opposing outer borders appear approximately 55/45 left-to-right and 50/50 top-to-bottom. Back borders appear approximately 55/45 or better on both axes. These are visual estimates accounting for the angled photographs, not precise physical measurements.
How this affects your grade:
Centering accounts for a significant portion of the overall grade. This exceptional score positively impacts the final grade.
Front Side
Back Side
Analysis
The aqua-colored patterned foil appears continuous, with no identifiable scratches, missing foil or roller lines. Rainbow highlights are normal foil reflections.
How this affects your grade:
Holographic accounts for a significant portion of the overall grade. This exceptional score positively impacts the final grade.
Precision Scan
Perspective-corrected inspection · 11 defects found
7.3
Corners
9
Edges
10
Surface
Visible wear is concentrated at the upper corners; no definite damage is apparent in the lower-corner crops. Foil streaks within the printed areas are not counted as damage, and soft focus limits assessment of the finest tip detail. No definite whitening, fraying, or other damage is visible along the outer cut edges. Dark streaks within the printed areas are not confirmed defects; assessment is limited to the supplied inverted views. No confirmed surface defects are visible in either variant; the bright streaks and speckling follow the holographic foil pattern. Soft focus limits assessment of very fine scratches or indentations. The top-left corner has the strongest visible wear, with clear paper exposure; the top-right and bottom-left also show corner whitening. The bottom-right is comparatively clean, although dark exposure and tight framing limit assessment of its extreme tip. Visible wear is concentrated at the top-left corner and along the upper left edge; the corner appears in both adjoining strips. No distinct damage is resolved on the bottom or right edge in these inverted views. No confirmed scratches, creases, stains, or other surface defects are visible in either variant. Sleeve reflections and uneven lighting limit assessment of some areas.
Front corners
Top-left corner
6/10
- moderatecorner wear — Upper-left tip and immediately adjacent left cut edge. The tip is softened with a narrow pale, irregular area extending onto the left cut edge.
Top-right corner
8/10
- minoredge wear — Outer right cut edge near the top. A thin, uneven pale strip is visible along the outer right edge.
Bottom-left corner
10/10
No defects found in this region
Bottom-right corner
10/10
No defects found in this region
Front edges
Top edge
10/10
No defects found in this region
Bottom edge
10/10
No defects found in this region
Left edge
10/10
No defects found in this region
Right edge
10/10
No defects found in this region
Front surface
Surface
10/10
No defects found in this region
Back corners
Back top-left corner
4/10
- moderatecorner wear — Corner tip. The corner is blunted and frayed, with a conspicuous patch of exposed pale paper.
- moderatewhitening — Left cut edge below the tip. An irregular pale band extends down the outer edge from the damaged corner.
Back top-right corner
6/10
- moderatewhitening — Corner tip and adjoining right cut edge. A narrow continuous strip of exposed pale paper runs along the right edge into the slightly softened tip.
Back bottom-left corner
6/10
- moderatecorner wear — Corner tip. The tip is softened and has a small pale worn area at the junction of the left and bottom edges.
- minoredge wear — Bottom cut edge beside the corner. A faint uneven pale line follows the bottom edge next to the tip.
Back bottom-right corner
8/10
- minorcorner wear — Corner tip. The dark corner tip appears slightly softened rather than forming a crisp square point.
Back edges
Back top edge
6/10
- moderatecorner wear — Left endpoint at the top-left corner. The corner tip is irregular and frayed, with a concentrated dark patch in the inverted image.
Back bottom edge
10/10
No defects found in this region
Back left edge
6/10
- moderatecorner wear — Upper endpoint at the top-left corner. The upper tip shows an irregular outline and concentrated exposed-paper marking.
- minoredge wear — Upper half of the outer cut edge. Small intermittent dark nicks interrupt the cut edge below the damaged corner.
Back right edge
10/10
No defects found in this region
Back surface
Back surface
10/10
No defects found in this region
Grading History & Distribution
Average Grade
9.0
Highest Grade
9.0
Total Submissions
1
Grade Distribution
Recent Submissions
Nov 6, 2026
9.0
Overall
Grading Consistency
Range: 9.0 - 9.0✅ Highly consistent grading across submissions