Menu

Home/Graded/Tinkaton ex
TCGrader

Tinkaton ex

Paldea Evolved

8.0
Card front

Grade

NM-MT

TCG-88D1801D

TCGrader

Card Back

Reverse Side

8.0
Card back

Authenticated

AI Verified

TCG-88D1801D

Hover to interact

Front

Photos

Pokémon

Tinkaton ex

Set
Paldea Evolved
Number
262/193
Year
2023
Owners
2
Est. Value
Raw Value

Card Owner

1
@148Rembrandt

Card Collector • Premium

Profile

Connect with collectors • Discuss cards • Build community

Active
Member
65
Cards

Card Information

Manufacturer
N/A
Grading Model
dual-ai-v5-bulkQuick Grade
Graded On
Jun 12, 2026

Grade Breakdown

Results

Front Side

8.0
QualityNear Mint
PercentileTop 20%

Back Side

8.0
QualityNear Mint
PercentileTop 20%

Analysis

Front: All four corners appear relatively sharp with only very minor softness. Back: Top-left corner shows minor whitening. Bottom-left corner shows slight whitening. Top-right and bottom-right corners show minor whitening as well.

How this affects your grade:

Corners accounts for a significant portion of the overall grade. This strong score contributes well to the final grade.

Issues Found (4)

whiteningminor

back top-left corner

Small area of whitening visible at the top-left corner

whiteningminor

back bottom-left corner

Faint whitening visible at the bottom-left corner

whiteningminor

back top-right corner

Slight whitening at top-right corner

whiteningminor

back bottom-right corner

Slight whitening at bottom-right corner

Front Side

8.8
QualityNear Mint
PercentileTop 13%

Back Side

8.8
QualityNear Mint
PercentileTop 13%

Analysis

Front: Edges appear clean with no visible nicks or chips along all four edges. Back: Minor edge wear visible along the left and bottom edges with faint whitening present.

How this affects your grade:

Edges accounts for a significant portion of the overall grade. This strong score contributes well to the final grade.

Issues Found (1)

edge-wearminor

back left edge

Very faint edge wear along the left side of the back

Front Side

9.0
QualityMint
PercentileTop 10%

Back Side

9.0
QualityMint
PercentileTop 10%

Analysis

Front: Holographic surface is clean with no visible scratches, scuffs, or creases. Print quality is sharp and consistent. Back: Surface appears clean and free of scratches, dents, or creases.

How this affects your grade:

Surface accounts for a significant portion of the overall grade. This exceptional score positively impacts the final grade.

Issues Found (5)

whiteningminor

back top-left corner

Small area of whitening visible at the top-left corner

whiteningminor

back bottom-left corner

Faint whitening visible at the bottom-left corner

whiteningminor

back top-right corner

Slight whitening at top-right corner

whiteningminor

back bottom-right corner

Slight whitening at bottom-right corner

edge-wearminor

back left edge

Very faint edge wear along the left side of the back

Front Side

8.0
QualityNear Mint
PercentileTop 20%

Back Side

8.0
QualityNear Mint
PercentileTop 20%

Analysis

Front: Left border is noticeably wider than the right border, estimated at approximately 57/43 left-right. Top-to-bottom centering appears close to 52/48. Back: Centering is slightly better, approximately 53/47 left-right and 50/50 top-bottom.

How this affects your grade:

Centering accounts for a significant portion of the overall grade. This strong score contributes well to the final grade.

Front Side

9.0
QualityMint
PercentileTop 10%

Back Side

9.0
QualityMint
PercentileTop 10%

Analysis

Holographic pattern is vibrant and clean with no clouding, scratches, or print anomalies. Rainbow effect displays properly across the full art illustration.

How this affects your grade:

Holographic accounts for a significant portion of the overall grade. This exceptional score positively impacts the final grade.

Grading History & Distribution

Average Grade

9.5

Highest Grade

9.5

Total Submissions

1

Grade Distribution

0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1
100%
10

Recent Submissions

1
Submission 1

Nov 25, 2025

9.5

Overall

Grading Consistency

Range: 9.5 - 9.5

✅ Highly consistent grading across submissions