Menu

Home/Graded/Ancient Mew
TCGrader

Ancient Mew

Wizards Black Star Promos

8.0
Card front

Grade

NM-MT

TCG-3A47FCFD

TCGrader

Card Back

Reverse Side

8.0
Card back

Authenticated

AI Verified

TCG-3A47FCFD

Hover to interact

Front

Photos

Pokémon

Ancient Mew

Set
Wizards Black Star Promos
Number
No Number
Year
2000
Owners
4
Est. Value
Raw Value

Card Owner

A
@Arnau Merlos

Card Collector • Premium

Profile

Connect with collectors • Discuss cards • Build community

Active
Member
1
Cards

Card Information

Manufacturer
N/A
Grading Model
dual-ai-v5Quick Grade
Graded On
Jun 29, 2026

Grade Breakdown

Results

Front Side

8.5
QualityNear Mint
PercentileTop 15%

Back Side

8.0
QualityNear Mint
PercentileTop 20%

Analysis

Front: All four corners appear relatively sharp with very minor softness visible on the top-left and bottom-right corners. Back: Slight softness on the top-left and bottom-left corners with faint wear visible at the tips.

How this affects your grade:

Corners accounts for a significant portion of the overall grade. This strong score contributes well to the final grade.

Issues Found (2)

whiteningminor

back bottom-left corner

Faint whitening at the bottom-left corner tip

whiteningminor

back top-left corner

Faint whitening at the top-left corner tip

Front Side

8.0
QualityNear Mint
PercentileTop 20%

Back Side

8.0
QualityNear Mint
PercentileTop 20%

Analysis

Front: Edges appear mostly clean with very slight wear along the top edge and minor handling marks along the left edge. Back: Minor edge wear along the left and bottom edges with very faint roughness visible.

How this affects your grade:

Edges accounts for a significant portion of the overall grade. This strong score contributes well to the final grade.

Issues Found (2)

edge-wearminor

front top edge

Very slight edge wear along the top edge

edge-wearminor

back left edge

Minor edge wear along the left edge

Front Side

8.5
QualityNear Mint
PercentileTop 15%

Back Side

8.5
QualityNear Mint
PercentileTop 15%

Analysis

Front: The holographic surface is clean with no visible scratches, creases, or scuffs. The holo pattern is vibrant. Back: The surface is clean with no visible scratches or creases. The textured metallic print appears intact.

How this affects your grade:

Surface accounts for a significant portion of the overall grade. This strong score contributes well to the final grade.

Issues Found (4)

edge-wearminor

front top edge

Very slight edge wear along the top edge

edge-wearminor

back left edge

Minor edge wear along the left edge

whiteningminor

back bottom-left corner

Faint whitening at the bottom-left corner tip

whiteningminor

back top-left corner

Faint whitening at the top-left corner tip

Front Side

7.5
QualityExcellent
PercentileTop 25%

Back Side

7.0
QualityExcellent
PercentileTop 30%

Analysis

Front: Borders are slightly off — approximately 55/45 left-to-right and 52/48 top-to-bottom. Back: More noticeably off-center — approximately 60/40 left-to-right with the left border wider than the right, and approximately 53/47 top-to-bottom.

How this affects your grade:

Centering accounts for a significant portion of the overall grade. Improving this area could increase the overall grade.

Front Side

8.5
QualityNear Mint
PercentileTop 15%

Back Side

8.5
QualityNear Mint
PercentileTop 15%

Analysis

The full-body holographic foil is intact and vibrant with strong prismatic rainbow effect. No scratches, clouding, or delamination observed. The holographic pattern shifts cleanly across the entire card surface.

How this affects your grade:

Holographic accounts for a significant portion of the overall grade. This strong score contributes well to the final grade.

Grading History & Distribution

Average Grade

6.5

Highest Grade

7.0

Total Submissions

3

Grade Distribution

0
1
2
3
4
5
1
33%
6
7
2
67%
8
9
10

Recent Submissions

1
Submission 1

Jun 29, 2026

7.0

Overall

2
Submission 2

Jun 26, 2026

5.5

Overall

3
Submission 3

May 14, 2026

7.0

Overall

Grading Consistency

Range: 5.5 - 7.0

✅ Highly consistent grading across submissions